Central Alabama Community College

Minutes, Roundtable Discussion for QEP
Division of Business, Math, Science, and Technology
July 9, 2004, 8:30 a.m.

Present: Jimmy Nix, Jeff Maddox, Wesley Storey, Shelley Wood, Mike Howard, Nancy Lilly, Paul Kornman, Nell Thompson, James Blair, Sarah Scott, Amelia Pearson, Laura Brown, Barbara Anne Spears

Mr. Nix began the meeting by welcoming everyone. He turned the floor over to Dr. Pearson for an announcement.

Dr. Pearson announced that the Implementation Meeting for I Can Learn had been set for Tuesday, July 13 at 2:30 p.m. in the Distance Learning Labs on both campuses. All math instructors were encouraged to attend. Training sessions are tentatively scheduled for July 29 and 30.

Mr. Nix then asked Mrs. Spears to provide an overview. Mrs. Spears reviewed the new SACS process, noting that the QEP (Quality Enhancement Plan) allows the College an opportunity to focus on a project designed to enhance student learning. Mrs. Spears noted that the College had chosen developmental/transitional education because 60% of the College’s students place into at least one developmental class.

Mr. Howard inquired about how to handle students whose skills fall below the abilities met by the objectives of the software. He said that some students cannot multiply and do not understand percentages. Dr. Pearson replied that I Can Learn representatives should be asked about this during the Implementation Meeting.

Discussion then centered on 091 and 092. Although the QEP Planning Committee had originally recommended discontinuation of 091 and 092, Dr. Pearson noted that the Alexander City campus will continue with 091 and 092 because the instructors teaching those courses believe them to be necessary. Not many students on the Childersburg campus test into these courses, but the Alexander City campus fills several classes.

Some instructors expressed concern about the I Can Learn program being taught entirely on computer as many students have no idea how to use a mouse and have no computer skills.

Sarah Scott distributed a typed list of her concerns about computer-based instruction as well as comments she had gathered from students. She then reviewed the comments with the group.

One major concern was that students will need reading skills in order to follow written instructions on self-paced software. Many students placing into developmental math courses also place into developmental reading and/or developmental writing.

Mrs. Spears noted that although many instructors in this division teach math and therefore have math concerns, the roundtable discussion is designed to focus on all areas of transitional education, not just math. With the concern about reading in the math segment, she asked if others had concerns or ideas about reading or writing. She gave the example that students may enroll in her public speaking class without having completed developmental English; therefore, a student may be required to complete outlines and speeches when they have not yet learned sentence or paragraph development. This often leads to failure for the student. State Board policy, however, allows students placing into only one developmental class to enroll in other classes.

Those who have viewed the I Can Learn software noted that it includes a teacher actually writing on a board working problems and discussing; therefore, instructions are not read-only. However, the student cannot ask the on-screen teacher a question.

Mrs. Wood said that in her Biology 101 class for non-majors, students have difficulty with labs because they cannot read well enough to follow the directions. Mr. Nix said that his economics students sometimes have similar problems. In addition, Mr. Nix stated that his economics students sometimes do not have the basic math skills needed for completing economics problems.

Attendees discussed the impact of open entry/open exit registration on math classes. The term “open entry/open exit” may imply that students may stay enrolled in a course as long as they wish – two or three terms if needed – but in fact, that will not be the case. “Open entry” will mean simply beginning at any time in the term; “open exit” will mean that students can complete the course before the term ends. Students may be able to get an Incomplete and continue until mid-point of the next term; math faculty must decide on the conditions which might make this possible – perhaps a completion percentage.

Nancy Lilly said that in the AVT lab, which includes self-paced study, students are encouraged to help others. This helps the instructor but also allows the students to gain greater knowledge by teaching others. Students are also sometimes more willing to ask another student for assistance than to ask the instructor.

Mrs. Brown would like to see faculty in developmental and non-developmental classes write “prescriptions” for remediation in specific areas, such as commas or fractions. No decision has been reached on whether students could be required to follow the prescription.

Mrs. Spears thanked everyone for their attendance and input. The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 a.m.
 
CACC QEP  Home CACC Home Last Updated: July 16,  2004